Moderator: Bonn-o-Tron
BFenix wrote:Silent-sigfig wrote:![]()
Coolest 1000th post ever
Silent-sigfig wrote:no need for PandoraNuker.

dilanski wrote:I had a nice conversation with him on chat. I think he should be let back in on some kind of probation.
Tzan wrote:Quantumsurfer wrote:I generally agree with TzanWarhead wrote:I agree with QuantumSmurfer.
I agree with Warhead.

aoffan23 wrote:dilanski wrote:I had a nice conversation with him on chat. I think he should be let back in on some kind of probation.
A nice conversation? All it consisted of was you two trying to think of ways to get him back on the forum. He got banned for a reason you know, and the dumb shit he says in chat isn't helping anything. I don't think stubby will let him back on for a while.

dilanski wrote:Silent-sigfig wrote:no need for PandoraNuker.
I had a nice conversation with him on chat. I think he should be let back in on some kind of probation.

Warhead wrote:I think a time out would do you good.

Warhead wrote:Obviously it's up to Stubby, which kind of makes me wonder why you would start this Pro-Pandora shtick in questioning Stubbies judgement with your ASBO crap. It would seem PedoNuker has done a marvellous grooming job on you and only after one Chat. Amazing.

dilanski wrote:7- PandoraNuker is just mis-undestood
Tzan wrote:Quantumsurfer wrote:I generally agree with TzanWarhead wrote:I agree with QuantumSmurfer.
I agree with Warhead.

aoffan23 wrote:dilanski wrote:7- PandoraNuker is just mis-undestood
I think you misunderstood how to spell misunderstood.
Also, I read over what happened in the chat, and I think he's misunderstood life. He wanted to create a new account, spam stubby's e-mail (which he apparently has three accounts for), and/or perma-ban stubby's home state. We misunderstand him?

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest