Page 3 of 4

Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:04 pm
by Bragallot
*slaps Colette around a bit with a large trout*

:sparta:

You need to differ mecha / tanks stats somehow imo, otherwise there's no point in choosing between building a mech or a tank because both are just the same except for their structure.

And I'll bet my head on it that something that starts at a higher height will take more time to descend before it hits the ground. Since we have futuristic targeting computers, guns and ammo, I declare your science null and void 8)

Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:15 pm
by cleanupcrew
I typo'd. Range is horizontal distance.Still doesn't change the conclusion.

Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:25 pm
by Falk
the 2010 rules wrote:Height advantage +1" Range per +1" altitude (maximum +5") 

Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:38 pm
by halo 3000
the 2010 rules wrote: Height advantage +1" Range per +1" altitude (maximum +5")

Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:50 pm
by cleanupcrew
Upon closer examination of the formula and being more awake you guys are right. I stand corrected.

Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:37 pm
by Silverdream
Image

Image

Image

Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:53 pm
by Ben-Jammin
:sbr:

Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII

Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 12:03 am
by Zupponn
Everything is awesome, and then I see the cannons. Something about them bothers me. Maybe it's their lack of awesomeness compared to the rest of the mech? :phil:

Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII

Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 11:33 am
by RoC77
Sweet mech! How's the load on the legs? I know I'm a criminal at this myself in my creations, but MOAR DAKKA!

Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII

Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 12:35 pm
by halo 3000
RoC77 wrote:How's the load on the legs?
I'm actually surprised that the legs hold it up. its fallen over a couple times, but that's when I try to move the legs on different positions.
RoC77 wrote:MOAR DAKKA!
I know, I know!
Zupponn wrote:Everything is awesome, and then I see the cannons.
I thought the same thing when I first built it. once I saw all four of them on there I didn't think they looked that bad.
Silverdream wrote:Image
This one is my favorite. I lol'd

Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII

Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 1:45 pm
by Predator
Good, now you need 499 more. Then we can do anti immortal fags vs immortal fags vs you.

Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII

Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 1:58 pm
by halo 3000
Predator wrote:Then we can do anti immortal handsome devils vs immortal handsome devils vs you.
I haven't picked a side on the war have I? I should do that soon.

Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII

Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 2:05 pm
by Predator
halo 3000 wrote:
Predator wrote:Then we can do anti immortal handsome devils vs immortal handsome devils vs you.
I haven't picked a side on the war have I? I should do that soon.
Yeah, side with anti-immortal faggettes. We need the support.

Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII

Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 2:29 pm
by Silverdream
Perhaps the Third Alliance is the place for you.

Re: 17th CMEF Titan MKIII

Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:36 pm
by Robot Monkey
Silverdream wrote:Perhaps the Third Alliance is the place for you.