Hoboman wrote:I forgot for a moment what forum I was on.








Rev. Sylvanus wrote:Hrm... those dreadnuts look strikingly familiar
BrikWars 2010 Rules wrote:BrikWars ... stands in pretty direct opposition to many fundamental elements of the LEGO® philosophy, such as "Not Teaching Kids How Funny It Is to Set People on Fire."
Rev. Sylvanus wrote:Looks like you are going to have to reformat the picture displays or make your MOC album public so we can link there
BrikWars 2010 Rules wrote:BrikWars ... stands in pretty direct opposition to many fundamental elements of the LEGO® philosophy, such as "Not Teaching Kids How Funny It Is to Set People on Fire."



















BrikWars 2010 Rules wrote:BrikWars ... stands in pretty direct opposition to many fundamental elements of the LEGO® philosophy, such as "Not Teaching Kids How Funny It Is to Set People on Fire."
Tzan wrote:Semaj Nagirrac wrote:Well, I took some land without checking if it was owned by a faction or not. I'm not going to be banned, am I? I can destroy everything if need be.
That's what Hitler said,
in 1938.
mgb519 wrote:I dunno...the openings above the ramps seem awfully small...
BrikWars 2010 Rules wrote:BrikWars ... stands in pretty direct opposition to many fundamental elements of the LEGO® philosophy, such as "Not Teaching Kids How Funny It Is to Set People on Fire."
Rev. Sylvanus wrote:...those size 3 weapons become essentially useless
BrikWars 2010 Rules wrote:BrikWars ... stands in pretty direct opposition to many fundamental elements of the LEGO® philosophy, such as "Not Teaching Kids How Funny It Is to Set People on Fire."
Tzan wrote:Semaj Nagirrac wrote:Well, I took some land without checking if it was owned by a faction or not. I'm not going to be banned, am I? I can destroy everything if need be.
That's what Hitler said,
in 1938.
Rev. Sylvanus wrote:You certainly don't HAVE to play it that way, but that is how the rules are set up (Ch. 7-8). The idea is less ABOUT size but more in terms of power capacity. A fully operational robot has all the power necessary to be efficient. But if you start blowing off limbs and taking chunks out of a vehicle, its overall power and efficiency is compromised (maybe in terms of electrical connections, etc). But even to take the example of a real human, blow off a GI's arm, and there is no chance in hell that he'll use the AR 15 with the same accuracy and deadly aim that he would have had if he was completely intact. Damage vehicles typically cannot go as far, run as fast, handle as sharply; try driving with a blown tire, or a door scraping the pavement. It's those sorts of things that "Size Damage" and "Effective Size" are trying to convey.

mgb519 wrote:Seriously, you are now the first ever forum superhero.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest