BW 2010 feedback

Rules questions, suggestions, and discussion

Moderators: IVhorseman, Pwnerade

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby stubby » Tue Apr 01, 2014 5:49 pm

Whiteagle wrote:
stubby wrote:if you guys ever want an adventure, try terminating half a dozen multi-year relationships all at once.

...And again, everyone wants to be Mike...

Man, you wouldn't want to be if you gave a little more thought to the ramifications of that last sentence there.

Now that I think about it, I was briefly monogamous during every one of the previous releases, although rarely during the years in between. I never noticed this pattern before, but it may be a big factor in why I haven't finished any releases since 2005.
User avatar
stubby
forum janitor
 
Posts: 4613
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Zupponn » Tue Apr 01, 2014 6:10 pm

stubby wrote:but it may be a big factor in why I haven't finished anything since 2005.

:ftfy:
Image
User avatar
Zupponn
No Lego part truly dies
No Lego part truly dies
 
Posts: 5341
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:15 pm
Location: Wisconsin, land of the cheese

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Whiteagle » Wed Apr 02, 2014 11:15 am

stubby wrote:
Whiteagle wrote:
stubby wrote:if you guys ever want an adventure, try terminating half a dozen multi-year relationships all at once.

...And again, everyone wants to be Mike...

Man, you wouldn't want to be if you gave a little more thought to the ramifications of that last sentence there.

Oh no Mike, the implacation of those ramifications come with the non-monogamy...
As they say, you made your bed, now you have to sleep in it.
User avatar
Whiteagle
Mega Blok
 
Posts: 1486
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:30 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby stubby » Wed Apr 02, 2014 3:11 pm

Whiteagle wrote:As they say, you made your bed, now you have to sleep in it.

Well that'll be a change. It's been years since I used it for sleeping in.
User avatar
stubby
forum janitor
 
Posts: 4613
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Silent-sigfig » Wed Apr 02, 2014 3:43 pm

"Leader" Stats

Every time a player has a hero use a feat to "summon reinforcements" or "motivate the troops", the player rolls a D6. The resulting number is the number of times the opposing player(s) may kick the original player in the nuts for attempting such a shitty feat. (No critical failures, unless the kicker(s) screw up. Critical successes still apply.)
BFenix wrote:
Silent-sigfig wrote: :dog:

Coolest 1000th post ever :D
User avatar
Silent-sigfig
Clown-Face Bologna
 
Posts: 2088
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2008 5:20 pm
Location: Number one in USA

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby The Shadowscythe » Wed Apr 02, 2014 4:39 pm

So basically, we need to convince manda to propose to you, marry you (most likely) against your will and then force you into the routine of married life until your only form of outage and rebellion - is to finish the damn rule book already.

To hell with it, it doesn't even have to be manda, someone just fuck mike into marrying them already.
-- WARNINK -- LINK BELOW IZ KNOWN TO CAUZE HEMMORAGE --
Spoiler: show
Image

I WARNED YOU, DIDN'T I WARN YOU?! BLAME RAYHAWK DAMNIT.
User avatar
The Shadowscythe
The Brikwars Trickster God.
 
Posts: 2534
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 7:22 am
Location: Lampeter, Wales

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Nimja » Mon Apr 07, 2014 2:49 am

I quite like the "Anorak vs Brikwarrior" text in the BW2001 book. I think this would go well under an "attitude" heading in the "Supplies" section, although maybe a little condenced.
What Mavericks sig is missing:
Silvawards 2013 wrote:Best Noob
Nominees
-Nimja
-Maverick
Winner: Maverick

The Empryan colonies!
User avatar
Nimja
BAHsLHASDSKJFWHEIJUSN
BAHsLHASDSKJFWHEIJUSN
 
Posts: 543
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 2:48 pm
Location: Location,Location

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Apollyon » Mon Apr 07, 2014 3:46 am

Whiteagle wrote:
stubby wrote:All right. After much thought this past week, I made the decision to become monogamous until the rulebook is finished, to give myself some free time finally. A couple of my girlfriends were (expectedly) pretty displeased at the news, but then a couple others were suprisingly supportive and happy to be on board with this plan, which... well I'm not sure how to take that, really. Anyway, if you guys ever want an adventure, try terminating half a dozen multi-year relationships all at once.

...And again, everyone wants to be Mike...


I had trouble dealing with two at once and even more when a third interfered. Being monogamous is sure easier in away. Then again, apparently Mike has much more experience in polyamoury so maybe i should make him my role model?
If you're not into Metal you are not my friend!
User avatar
Apollyon
My Little Pony
 
Posts: 1777
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 5:14 am
Location: I am in Berlin bitch!

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Brikguy0410 » Mon Apr 07, 2014 6:17 pm

Apollyon wrote:
Apollyon wrote:
Whiteagle wrote:
stubby wrote:All right. After much thought this past week, I made the decision to become monogamous until the rulebook is finished, to give myself some free time finally. A couple of my girlfriends were (expectedly) pretty displeased at the news, but then a couple others were suprisingly supportive and happy to be on board with this plan, which... well I'm not sure how to take that, really. Anyway, if you guys ever want an adventure, try terminating half a dozen multi-year relationships all at once.

...And again, everyone wants to be Mike...


I had trouble dealing with two at once and even more when a third interfered. Being monogamous is sure easier in a way. Then again, apparently Mike has much more experience in polyamoury so maybe i should make him my role model?

Wait, so mike has multiple girlfriends? Is he Muslim or something?
User avatar
Brikguy0410
Official Forum Science and History Expert
 
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 7:04 pm
Location: In a pineapple under the sea

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby IVhorseman » Mon Apr 07, 2014 7:33 pm

You don't?
User avatar
IVhorseman
If she don't want the brick, she won't get the dick
 
Posts: 6298
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: The Abyss

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby stubby » Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:03 am

Apollyon wrote:I had trouble dealing with two at once and even more when a third interfered. Being monogamous is sure easier in away.

I guess we'll find out. But if you have to "deal with" them then you picked the wrong ones.

Brikguy0410 wrote:Wait, so mike has multiple girlfriends? Is he Muslim or something?

Not anymore! But Muslims are limited to four (Sura 4:3), so that wouldn't have worked for me in any case.

IVhorseman wrote:You don't?

Seriously, we need to set some kind of minimum standards for forum membership here.
User avatar
stubby
forum janitor
 
Posts: 4613
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Gungnir » Tue Apr 08, 2014 4:56 pm

Brikguy0410 wrote:
Apollyon wrote:
Apollyon wrote:
Whiteagle wrote:
stubby wrote:All right. After much thought this past week, I made the decision to become monogamous until the rulebook is finished, to give myself some free time finally. A couple of my girlfriends were (expectedly) pretty displeased at the news, but then a couple others were suprisingly supportive and happy to be on board with this plan, which... well I'm not sure how to take that, really. Anyway, if you guys ever want an adventure, try terminating half a dozen multi-year relationships all at once.

...And again, everyone wants to be Mike...


I had trouble dealing with two at once and even more when a third interfered. Being monogamous is sure easier in a way. Then again, apparently Mike has much more experience in polyamoury so maybe i should make him my role model?

Wait, so mike has multiple girlfriends? Is he Muslim or something?

It's called Polyamory. Get with the times.
Give a minifig an inch, and he'll murder for a mile.
User avatar
Gungnir
Dimmy
 
Posts: 668
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:01 am

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby stubby » Tue Apr 08, 2014 6:50 pm

stubby wrote:
IVhorseman wrote:You don't?

Seriously, we need to set some kind of minimum standards for forum membership here.

Let me think here about the other admins and admin-adjacent types here for a minute. I know Scythe is living with four or five girls. Natalya's got at least two women in her relationship as far as I recall. Butthurt was in a harem of something like a half-dozen accommodating ladies, at least up until recently... I think we're probably doing okay from a leadership standpoint. I don't know why the rest of you haven't stepped up your game when you have such excellent role models.
User avatar
stubby
forum janitor
 
Posts: 4613
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Silverdream » Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:15 pm

The Shadowscythe wrote:To hell with it, it doesn't even have to be manda, someone just fuck mike into marrying them already.


I volunteer as tribute.
Image

Spoiler: show
mgb519 wrote:Seriously, you are now the first ever forum superhero.


Colette wrote:I hereby acknowledge Silverdream as the one and only forum troll as agreed in the bet.


Quantumsurfer wrote:No, I have 2 silver.
User avatar
Silverdream
Blockguy
 
Posts: 7285
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 5:33 pm
Location: In a giant pile of potatoes and red meat.

Re: BW 2010 feedback

Postby Zupponn » Tue Apr 08, 2014 10:22 pm

stubby wrote:I don't know why the rest of you haven't stepped up your game when you have such excellent role models.

That would require work.
Image
User avatar
Zupponn
No Lego part truly dies
No Lego part truly dies
 
Posts: 5341
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:15 pm
Location: Wisconsin, land of the cheese

PreviousNext

Return to The Rulebook

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests