Star Wars Supplement

Supplement ideas, house rules, homemade stat cards, homebrew weapon types, and other cool variations

Moderators: Rev. Sylvanus, warman45


Postby Greenkey15 » Sun May 03, 2009 6:37 pm

Looks good and complete. Only bad thing I see is that it's 2001.
User avatar
Greenkey15
no real authority over nonsensical crap
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 10:01 pm

2001 is bad?

Postby knight508 » Sun May 03, 2009 7:19 pm

:? I wasn't aware that the 2001 ruleset was inferior. I actually prefer it, as in my glorious Star Wars nerdiness I feel that the 2001 rules give a lot more depth than the 2005 rules. I may eventually post a 2005 version of this stuff as well...
You have been destroyed, wiped out, and disintegrated. Defeat is imminent.
User avatar
knight508
Champion
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 10:43 am
Location: In the lab...

Postby pesgores » Mon May 04, 2009 2:17 pm

Lol how many time did you take to do this and then someone said that it should be done according to the 2005 ruleset instead of 2001?
"You can get more of what you want with a kind word and a gun, that you can with just a kind word." - Al Capone
My official post number 1000 was "The whole battle?"
Image
User avatar
pesgores
forum disapproval celebrity
 
Posts: 3343
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 5:47 am
Location: Looking for baseplates

Postby tahthing » Mon May 04, 2009 2:19 pm

pesgores wrote:Lol how many time did you take to do this and then someone said that it should be done according to the 2005 ruleset instead of 2001?

this is bad i am retarded.
"some people are like slinkies there really good for nothing, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs"
"Triangalism! What's the fuckin' point!"
User avatar
tahthing
probably j+b's second account
 
Posts: 1303
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 7:02 pm
Location: heading for his second 1337 post.

Postby pesgores » Mon May 04, 2009 2:36 pm

tahthing wrote:
pesgores wrote:Lol how many time did you take to do this and then someone said that it should be done according to the 2005 ruleset instead of 2001?

this is bad i am retarded.


"i am retarded" is bad grammar too.
"You can get more of what you want with a kind word and a gun, that you can with just a kind word." - Al Capone
My official post number 1000 was "The whole battle?"
Image
User avatar
pesgores
forum disapproval celebrity
 
Posts: 3343
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 5:47 am
Location: Looking for baseplates

Postby tahthing » Mon May 04, 2009 4:37 pm

no i am retarded is bad spelling
"some people are like slinkies there really good for nothing, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs"
"Triangalism! What's the fuckin' point!"
User avatar
tahthing
probably j+b's second account
 
Posts: 1303
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 7:02 pm
Location: heading for his second 1337 post.

Postby birdman » Mon May 04, 2009 4:52 pm

tahthing wrote:no i am retarded is bad spelling


Image
Image
User avatar
birdman
I have a wife, you know
 
Posts: 1241
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 9:29 am

Re: 2001 is bad?

Postby Greenkey15 » Mon May 04, 2009 4:57 pm

knight508 wrote::? I wasn't aware that the 2001 ruleset was inferior. I actually prefer it, as in my glorious Star Wars nerdiness I feel that the 2001 rules give a lot more depth than the 2005 rules. I may eventually post a 2005 version of this stuff as well...


It isn't inferior, just most players don't use it.
User avatar
Greenkey15
no real authority over nonsensical crap
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 10:01 pm

Postby birdman » Mon May 04, 2009 4:58 pm

many are of the impression that it is superior, just too in-depth. think of 2001 being to 2005 what rogue trader was to 4th edition.
Image
User avatar
birdman
I have a wife, you know
 
Posts: 1241
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 9:29 am

Answering Questions/Comments

Postby knight508 » Mon May 04, 2009 8:21 pm

Persegores Wrote:
i am retarded" is bad grammar too.

Lol how many time did you take to do this and then someone said that it should be done according to the 2005 ruleset instead of 2001?


1. Both your grammar leaves much to be desired.
2. Actually, this took me about a week. 2001 as opposed to 2005 is a matter of personal preference. I prefer 2001. And, if you look at it, there really isn't anything that's incompatible with 2005 rules in my supplement. I've actually playtested this with 2005 and 2001. It works in both.
3. And in reply to the mole-type creature... I resent that. :evil:

Thanks for your comments.
You have been destroyed, wiped out, and disintegrated. Defeat is imminent.
User avatar
knight508
Champion
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 10:43 am
Location: In the lab...

Postby IVhorseman » Tue May 05, 2009 1:33 am

birdman wrote:many are of the impression that it is superior, just too in-depth. think of 2001 being to 2005 what rogue trader was to 4th edition.


4th edition is awesome and you know it (seriously, I just came back from the most brutal delve in my life).

Oh also (Rayhawk, listen up), they plopped gnomes AND bards into PHB 2, so Büttrøck can live again.
User avatar
IVhorseman
herbal genius
 
Posts: 5437
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: The Abyss

Re: Answering Questions/Comments

Postby pesgores » Tue May 05, 2009 1:38 pm

knight508 wrote:1. Both your grammar leaves much to be desired.


I'm not a native English speaker. At least you understand me.

E agora começo mesmo a falar português só para te irritar e se usares algum programa tradutor temos pena. Além disso, podes não perceber certas expressões. Resumindo, cala a boca.
"You can get more of what you want with a kind word and a gun, that you can with just a kind word." - Al Capone
My official post number 1000 was "The whole battle?"
Image
User avatar
pesgores
forum disapproval celebrity
 
Posts: 3343
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 5:47 am
Location: Looking for baseplates

Postby Greenkey15 » Tue May 05, 2009 3:05 pm

Sou um grande pato.
User avatar
Greenkey15
no real authority over nonsensical crap
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 10:01 pm

Chaos has Risen

Postby knight508 » Tue May 05, 2009 3:30 pm

This entire thread is rapidly dissolving into chaos. The point of this was to act as as sounding board for a new supplement, not an infantile argumentation arena. :evil:
You have been destroyed, wiped out, and disintegrated. Defeat is imminent.
User avatar
knight508
Champion
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 10:43 am
Location: In the lab...

Next

Return to Bonus Material

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Zupponn and 1 guest