Colette wrote:Although, wouldn't that be a minifigs rights violation?
Minifigs have the right to combat.
Moderators: Almighty Benny, Blitzen, Silent-sigfig
Colette wrote:Although, wouldn't that be a minifigs rights violation?

mgb519 wrote:Seriously, you are now the first ever forum superhero.


Lego Company wrote:...At the same time, the purpose is for the LEGO brand not to be associated with issues that glorify conflicts and unethical or harmful behavior...

Colette wrote:The Military of United Nations (Trattoria) believes that we should first, as the Allied Nations General Assembly, address the question of clearly defining mini fig rights.


stubby wrote:omg noob, balrogs are maiars too, don't you know anything



stubby wrote:omg noob, balrogs are maiars too, don't you know anything

Lego Company wrote:...At the same time, the purpose is for the LEGO brand not to be associated with issues that glorify conflicts and unethical or harmful behavior...


RunsWithLegos wrote:the Coalition Objects the Tratorians Objections on the grounds that they are sissies.

Lego Company wrote:...At the same time, the purpose is for the LEGO brand not to be associated with issues that glorify conflicts and unethical or harmful behavior...

Warhead wrote:my head burns with War.



Colette wrote:The Trattorian Empire recognizes the importance alcohol and metal (music) have to other nations and cultures, but simply believes it would be too controversial to impose such items as rights on every nation as of now.
Users browsing this forum: Kalvinator and 1 guest