Moderators: Almighty Benny, Blitzen, Silent-sigfig


stubby wrote:When a million people are willing to fight their asses off to get you fired, I don't think "popularity" is what you call it even if you manage to avoid the chopping block.
stubby wrote:It's a hell of a lot cheaper though. The Kochs and all the foreign corporations funding Walker's PACs had to outspend the opposition by 700% in order to keep the guy in office.

Zupponn wrote:This whole recall was started by unions afraid of not getting a living wage, so I for one am glad that Walker fucked the middle class.
Tzan wrote:Zupponn wrote:This whole recall was started by unions afraid of not getting a living wage, so I for one am glad that Walker fucked the middle class.
Fix'd

Zupponn wrote:Well, if the union bosses can't get a living wage anymore, then they should start getting real jobs. And why would the middle class be overwhelmingly in support of Walker if he screwed them over?
Tzan wrote:Its not about bosses, its about workers who would actually like to keep a real job.
Tzan wrote:The re-publican middle class frequently votes against its own self interest, due to ignorance and misinformation delivered as fact.

Zupponn wrote:When a million people in a state of over 4 million want to get a guy fired, then to you, it doesn't matter what the other 3 million people have to say? That's my biggest beef with the recall. They didn't need even a quarter of the state's population to start one.

Blitzen wrote:Aside from being "not Scott Walker", the opponent very little going for him. It was time for Walker go. The only problem is, you need someone to replace him. You need a candidate to run towards, not just someone to run from.



Blitzen wrote:Zupponn wrote:When a million people in a state of over 4 million want to get a guy fired, then to you, it doesn't matter what the other 3 million people have to say? That's my biggest beef with the recall. They didn't need even a quarter of the state's population to start one.
They actually didn't need 1 million signatures, but they got a million. I can't find a clear number on voter turnout, but it was between 55% and 65%... among eligible voters. A far cry from 4 million people.
Blitzen wrote:Corporate money does make a difference. In California Proposition 29 would increase the tax on cigarettes by $1, to $1.90. In March it was polling at 67%. It was narrowly defeated, 50.8% to 49.2%. Why the sudden change? The tobacco industry spend $47 million on ads.
Blitzen wrote:On your union hogwash: you're stupid. I don't know how else to put it. You're stupid, and you don't understand how unions work beyond the garbage propaganda you've been fed. Do you think union-busting balanced the budget? You're stupid. It's political strategy. Where giant corporations are the top spenders for Repubs, unions are top spenders for Dems. This is part of the Repub plan for the next election, and that's who it helps. No one else. You're stupid.

Blitzen wrote:On your union hogwash: you're stupid. I don't know how else to put it. You're stupid, and you don't understand how unions work beyond the garbage propaganda you've been fed. Do you think union-busting balanced the budget? You're stupid. It's political strategy. Where giant corporations are the top spenders for Repubs, unions are top spenders for Dems. This is part of the Repub plan for the next election, and that's who it helps. No one else. You're stupid.
Natalya wrote:Oh and there wasn't some kind of budget problem when he got into office... He created it by passing some tax breaks, then used the deficit he just created as an excuse for his union busting.
Natalya wrote:Oh and Zuppon, why do you talk about unions trying to make a shit ton of money? Do you even know what a union is?


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest