Walking Doom

Post by **Adean** » Sat Jul 26, 2008 12:19 am

You know you're a nerd:

#63: If you ever thought that stormtroopers looked attractive. Ever.

#64: If you ever thought that Princess Leah looked attractive. Ever. (I know you're out there...)

#65: If you noticed that I misspelled "Leia".

Post by **blackwing77** » Sat Jul 26, 2008 1:25 am

IVhorseman wrote:i actually saw one of those at comic-con today

how was that?

Post by **IVhorseman** » Sat Jul 26, 2008 1:27 am

amazing, and not over yet.

also, crowded.

Post by **Dr. X** » Sat Jul 26, 2008 8:42 am

I was there and it was soggy.

Post by **Erasmas** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:23 pm

Dr. X wrote:

Adean wrote:You know you're a nerd:

#63: If you ever thought that stormtroopers looked attractive. Ever.

Well, I guess if I wasn't before... I am now.

Post by **ace121** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:53 pm

That ain't that attractive: very poor lighting IMO.

Post by **The Shadowscythe** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:58 pm

Poor lighting conditions, better lighting is a must! and the photograph is not attractive, for a start, the girl is in the middle of the shot, not one of the edges, from committing myself to media through most of my education, it is far more attractive to have your figure(s) at the edge of the photograph, to lead the viewers eyes towards them.

Also the background isn't attractive in the slightest, that beige is murder, and a glass door? since when did those make for attractive viewing.

(I just proved my nerdery by slating an unattractive picture of a storm trooper, I have no idea what the hell to make of this myself! XD)

Post by **ace121** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 1:03 pm

Yeah... But honsetly, I think that picture is a pretty crap excuse for a weird subject...

Post by **Erasmas** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 1:44 pm

Yeah... cause I was completely talking about the lighting and the background.

And with photography, you actually use the "rule of thirds" for aesthetics. Basically, you divide the frame into a tic-tac-toe and use those lines to place your subjects. As far as leading the viewers' eyes, you use other angles and lines (such as where a wall meets the floor, or a sidewalk) to draw them to your subject.

Post by **Dr. X** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 6:19 pm

The Shadowscythe wrote:Poor lighting conditions, better lighting is a must! and the photograph is not attractive, for a start, the girl is in the middle of the shot, not one of the edges, from committing myself to media through most of my education, it is far more attractive to have your figure(s) at the edge of the photograph, to lead the viewers eyes towards them.

Also the background isn't attractive in the slightest, that beige is murder, and a glass door? since when did those make for attractive viewing.

(I just proved my nerdery by slating an unattractive picture of a storm trooper, I have no idea what the hell to make of this myself! XD)

No no no, you've got it all wrong. You did not prove your nerdery yet. You've have to say something like this to prove it:

"OMGROFLBACONZ THAT STRMTROOPRES GOT BIG BOOBEHS!!! ROXORX MAEH SOXORZ."

That would prove your neredery. I already proved mine because I wrote insanely long paragraphs on shield dynamics and read every single book ever made on tactical air combat aerodynamics.

Post by **ace121** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 6:43 pm

She does not have big boobs. You think too small; you must think out of the box on this one.

Post by **pesgores** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 7:37 pm

ace121 wrote:She does not have big boobs. You think too small; you must think out of the box on this one.

How can you be so certain that that person is a SHE, not a HE???

You never know...

Post by **piltogg** » Mon Jul 28, 2008 7:47 pm

might be steroids. Dun dun dun

Post by **IVhorseman** » Tue Jul 29, 2008 10:25 am

because guys lack boobs and have a crotch bulge. even with steroid shrinkage, you'd see a lump in underoos that are THAT tight.

Post by **Blitzen** » Tue Jul 29, 2008 11:05 am

IVhorseman wrote:because guys lack boobs and have a crotch bulge. even with steroid shrinkage, you'd see a lump in underoos that are THAT tight.

Eat it, Dr. Seuss!