BrikWars Forum

God Listens... TO SLAYER!!

Skip to content

2001 vs 2005

Rules questions, suggestions, and discussion

Moderators: IVhorseman, Pwnerade

Post a reply

2001 vs 2005

Postby Bonn-o-Tron » Sat Apr 21, 2012 8:41 pm

I'm looking to get my friends into the veritable barrel of lunacy that is Brikwars, and I'm not sure if I should baptize them through the 2001 or 2005 rules.
Currently, I'm leaning towards 2001, as we've played a variety of tabletop games (model-based warfare, board, and otherwise) including Warhammer 40k, which my friends had a particular penchant for. I have no lack of faith in their prowess for making sense of convoluted rules, stats, variables and all other manners of mind-numbing nonsense that come with table-based fun.

The further I explain, the more obvious it seems that the answer to my inquiry is 2001, however I'm unfamiliar with the 2001 rules, so I don't know how they compare, especially for the uninitiated.
Image
:rei: :rei: :rei: :rei: :rei: :rei: :rei:
TROLOLO
Bonn-o-Tron
Smuggle Buddy
 
Posts: 1706
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 11:58 pm
Location: Brodmann area 17
Top

Re: 2001 vs 2005

Postby Gungnir » Sat Apr 21, 2012 8:59 pm

Go for 2005 and make up everything you don't see in there on the spot.
Image
Dice Sixes
User avatar
Gungnir
Dimmy
 
Posts: 506
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:01 am
Top

Re: 2001 vs 2005

Postby Tzan » Sat Apr 21, 2012 9:42 pm

Bonn-o-Tron wrote: however I'm unfamiliar with the 2001 rules,


Well you had me right up until that ^

You should start with the rules you are most familiar with.
User avatar
Tzan
a permi-officer-complainer
 
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:41 pm
Location: Boston
Top

Re: 2001 vs 2005

Postby IVhorseman » Sun Apr 22, 2012 3:06 am

Or learn 2010
User avatar
IVhorseman
herbal genius
 
Posts: 5479
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: The Abyss
Top

Re: 2001 vs 2005

Postby tymon555 » Sun Apr 22, 2012 3:13 am

Are there complete 2010 rules?
http://www.brikwars.com/rules/2010/
But it isn't complete.
Oh, He's here.
User avatar
tymon555
Minifig
 
Posts: 224
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:06 am
Location: Here, i think
Top

Re: 2001 vs 2005

Postby IVhorseman » Sun Apr 22, 2012 3:15 am

Fill the gaps with 2005 rules and it's playable!
User avatar
IVhorseman
herbal genius
 
Posts: 5479
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 10:12 pm
Location: The Abyss
Top

Re: 2001 vs 2005

Postby Ben-Jammin » Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:26 am

I like 2005 most, but use some of the weapons stats from 2010 and a lot of supplements from 2001.
Infantry may be the Queen of battle, but Armor is the chastity belt that keeps that bitch from getting snuggled.
Image
User avatar
Ben-Jammin
Playmobil
 
Posts: 1604
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 5:59 pm
Location: Not quite the middle of Appalachia
Top

Re: 2001 vs 2005

Postby Zahru II » Sun Apr 22, 2012 11:43 am

2005 is the best.
BFenix wrote:Zahru kicks so much ass!


My stuff: Medivo / Armylists / Battles / SPACE
User avatar
Zahru II
Childhood raped by Dumbledore
 
Posts: 3612
Joined: Fri Jul 24, 2009 6:22 am
Location: Hüngäry
Top

Re: 2001 vs 2005

Postby Legofighter » Mon Apr 23, 2012 4:41 pm

Zahru II wrote:2001 is the true brikwars rules.

Fix'd
Edit: LONG LIVE PILTOGG
I SWEAR TO SCREW THAT SILVANIGHTMARE THING!
May the Third Alliance die, the sooner the better!
User avatar
Legofighter
Proto-Shakespeare
Proto-Shakespeare
 
Posts: 193
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 2:42 pm
Location: Grammar Assassin's Kingdom
Top

Re: 2001 vs 2005

Postby Silverdream » Mon Apr 23, 2012 8:17 pm

Zahru II wrote:Tzan is the best.


Fix'd.
Image

mgb519 wrote:Seriously, you are now the first ever forum superhero.
User avatar
Silverdream
the most annoying
the most annoying
 
Posts: 5146
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 5:33 pm
Location: Universe City
Top

Re: 2001 vs 2005

Postby Keldoclock » Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:42 am

Silverdream wrote:
Zahru II wrote:Tzan is the most quoted member of this forum


Fix'd.
Image
stubby wrote:omg noob, balrogs are maiars too, don't you know anything
User avatar
Keldoclock
just PayPal gainax ten bucks
just PayPal gainax ten bucks
 
Posts: 2869
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 2:19 pm
Location: New York City
Top

Re: 2001 vs 2005

Postby sjosten » Tue Apr 24, 2012 11:09 am

Speaking from personal experience, 7-12 year olds can understand 2005 rules fairly quicky allowing us to get to the battle faster. Your friends have played wargames before, so I would think 2005 would seem even simpler and easier to use quickly for them.
Han Solo wrote: Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side kid.
User avatar
sjosten
Minifig
 
Posts: 273
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:07 am
Location: Franklin Tennessee
Top

Re: 2001 vs 2005

Postby Blitzen » Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:50 pm

I really hope Bonn-o-Tron's friends are not 7-12 years old.

Image
Image
Often, literally, a pillow fight but may include similar situations like volleyball, particularly when wardrobe is skimpy and the action is bouncy.
User avatar
Blitzen
Grammar Assassin
 
Posts: 1847
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 5:17 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Top

Re: 2001 vs 2005

Postby Whiteagle » Sun Apr 29, 2012 5:58 pm

Blitzen wrote:I really hope Bonn-o-Tron's friends are not 7-12 years old.

Hey, my Nephew is around that age and I tried to get him into Brikwars...

...To bad he's not a very good reader yet...
User avatar
Whiteagle
WHITE EAGLE - NOT A CONJOINED "E"
WHITE EAGLE - NOT A CONJOINED "E"
 
Posts: 1339
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:30 pm
Top

Re: 2001 vs 2005

Postby Tzan » Sun Apr 29, 2012 6:49 pm

Its all true, I am the best.
User avatar
Tzan
a permi-officer-complainer
 
Posts: 4015
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:41 pm
Location: Boston
Top
Next
Post a reply

Return to The Rulebook

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group