Post random Gifs! WARNING: TOO AWESOME FOR THOSE WITH DIALUP

[GeneralOfDeath]

Where's the beer bottle?

[Warhead]

Up it's arse?

[Silverdream]

Lesbians can prematurely ejaculate?

[Predator]

Lesbians can prematurely ejaculate?

Yep

@Warhead: Haruko be all like

At your post.

[GeneralOfDeath]

Best part is that I'm not a Texan, but I do come from the middle of nowhere.

[stubby]

Lesbians can prematurely ejaculate?

They sure can, but it's not a game-ender. The ones who do are, for the most part, more than happy to keep going for a dozen more times.

If you encounter this issue, allow me to personally recommend the Liberator Fascinator Microfiber Throe Blanket. Machine washable and very effective at preventing overenthusiastic lesbians from turning your mattress into a lake.

[Predator]

Stubby, stop inventing stupid stuff that is actually really handy if you think about it.

[Warhead]

He's not making stuff up. Also, I'm pretty sure all or most women have the capacity to be squirters. If you do it right.

[Predator]

He's not making stuff up. Also, I'm pretty sure all or most women have the capacity to be squirters. If you do it right.

.

If that stuff exist, then we're fucked. Those things will suck up the world!

[stubby]

If that stuff exist, then we're fucked. Those things will suck up the world!

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Liberator+Fascinat ... oe+Blanket

[Nitewatchman]

That awkward moment when I just read the wikipedia article on this phenomenon the other night.

Liek...okay, from what I understand, female ejaculation is a hotly debated issue in the medical world. From what I've read, it has been studied at length for centuries, though it wasn't ALWAYS a debate. You see, once upon a time, it was a commonly accepted fact that women could, uh...fire the 'ole squirtgun. HOWEVER, this mainly stemmed from the idea that the way sex and conception worked was that the man's goo swirled around in the woman's goo inside her baby hole and magically that became a baby, somehow.

Now, like I said, there's a lot of medical study that suggests it is f'reals thing and comes from...eh...I forget all the words, but there's some sort of female-prostate theory and there's squeezing and juicing and PACHOO!

But the main reason this seems to be such an argument, from what I understand, is that feminists are split on the issue and the half against the idea of female ejaculation is incredibly loud. Basically, some feminists view the idea of female ejaculation as empowering, while others view it as nothing more than the wet dreams of men that like to think lesbian sex is crazy awesome, and view that as demeaning.

There are also some incredibly influential sexologists that just dismiss it as urinary incontinence for I don't know what reason.


There's more information to that, but this is in Threads that are Dumb and throwing out all that information might make this thread Smart, and who wants that? Anyway, the moral of the story is that wikipedia is a hell of a drug and wikicomas can lead to strange but awkwardly interesting information.


Where's Natalya? I bet she knows stuff about this.

..BECAUSE SHE WAS A GENDER STUDIES MAJOR.

[Warhead]

Yeah, well I'm a Muff Diving General

[Silverdream]

And I am Admiral of the tit.

No, I'm not. I'm a pathetic loser who can't even think about girls without crying.

[GeneralOfDeath]

That awkward moment when I just read the wikipedia article on this phenomenon the other night.

Liek...okay, from what I understand, female ejaculation is a hotly debated issue in the medical world. From what I've read, it has been studied at length for centuries, though it wasn't ALWAYS a debate. You see, once upon a time, it was a commonly accepted fact that women could, uh...fire the 'ole squirtgun. HOWEVER, this mainly stemmed from the idea that the way sex and conception worked was that the man's goo swirled around in the woman's goo inside her baby hole and magically that became a baby, somehow.

Now, like I said, there's a lot of medical study that suggests it is f'reals thing and comes from...eh...I forget all the words, but there's some sort of female-prostate theory and there's squeezing and juicing and PACHOO!

But the main reason this seems to be such an argument, from what I understand, is that feminists are split on the issue and the half against the idea of female ejaculation is incredibly loud. Basically, some feminists view the idea of female ejaculation as empowering, while others view it as nothing more than the wet dreams of men that like to think lesbian sex is crazy awesome, and view that as demeaning.

There are also some incredibly influential sexologists that just dismiss it as urinary incontinence for I don't know what reason.


There's more information to that, but this is in Threads that are Dumb and throwing out all that information might make this thread Smart, and who wants that? Anyway, the moral of the story is that wikipedia is a hell of a drug and wikicomas can lead to strange but awkwardly interesting information.


Where's Natalya? I bet she knows stuff about this.

..BECAUSE SHE WAS A GENDER STUDIES MAJOR.

There are some feminists who think that missionary position is demeaning.

[stubby]

Where's Natalya? I bet she knows stuff about this.

..BECAUSE SHE WAS A GENDER STUDIES MAJOR.

There are some feminists who think that missionary position is demeaning.

There are a million kinds of feminism, despite what Rush Limbaugh would tell you.



Celebration of the multiple-orgasm squirters though...



falls under third wave feminism



(No seriously, it kind of does)