BrikWiki

You know, whatever

Moderators: Blitzen, Silent-sigfig, Almighty Benny

Re: BrikWiki

Postby Ham701 » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:31 pm

I'll still use G.R. no matter what. Looks cool, whereas "R" looks weak. G.R. 2013 vs R. 2013
stubby wrote: my floppy penis gets first dibs on it for tradition's sake, but it doesn't seem likely that he'll want to stick around long enough to play.

Image
User avatar
Ham701
Galidor
 
Posts: 1165
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 11:11 pm
Location: Watching DS9

Re: BrikWiki

Postby Quantumsurfer » Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:38 pm

There ya go.
User avatar
Quantumsurfer
Thank god for Colette.
 
Posts: 1477
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:27 pm

Re: BrikWiki

Postby Natalya » Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:35 pm

G.R. has fewer syllables than Rekonstruction. :rtfm:
Image
  ▲
▲ ▲

"Each night alone I dream, that I'm a rebel Roller Queen‼
I'll be a star that shines, I can make the whole world mine‼"


Image
User avatar
Natalya
Tremble in awe, for I am become Admin, Banner of Noobs.
Tremble in awe, for I am become Admin, Banner of Noobs.
 
Posts: 5357
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:57 pm
Location: Now in Ontario

Re: BrikWiki

Postby Quantumsurfer » Wed Feb 13, 2013 8:47 pm

R. has fewer syllables than galaktik revolution.
User avatar
Quantumsurfer
Thank god for Colette.
 
Posts: 1477
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:27 pm

Re: BrikWiki

Postby pkbrennan » Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:04 pm

Rekonstruktion makes more sense for timelines that are not space age or space based - like my 1920s - 1930s stuff I am working on (sssh it's a sekrit)
The World of Pekab & the Anarcho-Syndicalist Adventurers Guild <== new site

"Everything needs more Dakka, including the Dakka..."
User avatar
pkbrennan
Cannon Fodder
 
Posts: 390
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 7:54 am

Re: BrikWiki

Postby Quantumsurfer » Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:39 pm

pkbrennan wrote:1920s - 1930s stuff I am working on


I'm stoked to see that.
User avatar
Quantumsurfer
Thank god for Colette.
 
Posts: 1477
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:27 pm

Re: BrikWiki

Postby Quantumsurfer » Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:49 pm

R.-G.R. debate handled in Rekon article, btw.
User avatar
Quantumsurfer
Thank god for Colette.
 
Posts: 1477
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:27 pm

Re: BrikWiki

Postby pkbrennan » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:11 am

I need a lot more parts.

Will be hitting the bootfairs soon.

Meanwhile, why don't we have a traders board here? Companies like Brickarms / Brickwarrior can put their posts there and we can do private trades too. Caveat emptor, and all that, of course...
The World of Pekab & the Anarcho-Syndicalist Adventurers Guild <== new site

"Everything needs more Dakka, including the Dakka..."
User avatar
pkbrennan
Cannon Fodder
 
Posts: 390
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 7:54 am

Re: BrikWiki

Postby Quantumsurfer » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:15 am

Well, alright, I finally got the multiverse up. So all the alt dimensions are done (until we add more, of course). Please enjoy.
User avatar
Quantumsurfer
Thank god for Colette.
 
Posts: 1477
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:27 pm

Re: BrikWiki

Postby pkbrennan » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:28 am

What tek level would you give the 1920s - 1930s with a bit of Diesel Punk thrown in for good measure? 4?
The World of Pekab & the Anarcho-Syndicalist Adventurers Guild <== new site

"Everything needs more Dakka, including the Dakka..."
User avatar
pkbrennan
Cannon Fodder
 
Posts: 390
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 7:54 am

Re: BrikWiki

Postby Quantumsurfer » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:49 am

Based on the 2001 chart, 3.
Based on Natalya's chart, 4.

Depends which one you like better.
User avatar
Quantumsurfer
Thank god for Colette.
 
Posts: 1477
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:27 pm

Re: BrikWiki

Postby pkbrennan » Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:59 am

I might add some "more futuristic" hand weapons so the tek is gonna get pretty messed up. It might be worth going for tek 4 to cover the high end stuff while accounting for all the low end stuff. Those funny rail gun rifles from brickarms are on their way to me, along with a couple of RPG7's and a couple of other bits (inc two crates).

Tesco have the Dino jeep thing from lego with the Velociraptor (sp?) for £18 so I might pick a couple up for big yellow jeeps. As for the Dinos, well, Dino-riding mummies will become a thing...
The World of Pekab & the Anarcho-Syndicalist Adventurers Guild <== new site

"Everything needs more Dakka, including the Dakka..."
User avatar
pkbrennan
Cannon Fodder
 
Posts: 390
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 7:54 am

Re: BrikWiki

Postby Quantumsurfer » Thu Feb 14, 2013 3:45 am

I'd guess that's why TL is nothing more than a guideline now and why a whole lot of folks blatantly ignore it. Since it's part of the template, if you really want to, I suppose a solution would be to hybridize it. Like if someone did a Space 1889 theme and they had steampunk starships, they could rate their TL as 3/5 (maybe 3-5 would be a better way to write it since it might also include 4 stuff) by the modern chart. You could do 3/4, or 3-4.
User avatar
Quantumsurfer
Thank god for Colette.
 
Posts: 1477
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 5:27 pm

Re: BrikWiki

Postby pkbrennan » Thu Feb 14, 2013 4:16 am

You got pics of this space 1889 stuff please? Or linkies? :mrgreen:
The World of Pekab & the Anarcho-Syndicalist Adventurers Guild <== new site

"Everything needs more Dakka, including the Dakka..."
User avatar
pkbrennan
Cannon Fodder
 
Posts: 390
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 7:54 am

Re: BrikWiki

Postby stubby » Thu Feb 14, 2013 11:07 am

Quantumsurfer wrote:I'd guess that's why TL is nothing more than a guideline now and why a whole lot of folks blatantly ignore it. Since it's part of the template, if you really want to, I suppose a solution would be to hybridize it. Like if someone did a Space 1889 theme and they had steampunk starships, they could rate their TL as 3/5 (maybe 3-5 would be a better way to write it since it might also include 4 stuff) by the modern chart. You could do 3/4, or 3-4.

Or you could ignore numbers and take a more thematic approach. "TekLevel = DieselPunk with AlienTek" or something.
User avatar
stubby
forum janitor
 
Posts: 4921
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:31 pm

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 2 guests